When you enter a game you have to accept the rules and believe in the seriousness of what you are doing, if you do not want to fall into the category of cheating, or even worse, the damper that Huizinga identified in a test of '35. The nature of the game is such that it continues to exist even in the absence of players, which in turn will turn it back on but not reinvent it (at least not to betray him, turning it into something different). As a reminder
Jopili in his article for OV 9 , this situation can be found as such in the narrative (even better if it comes to serial narrative, heavily based on a number of references and references that help to give her strength and character), giving rise to a result greater than the sum of its parts, something that once detached from the author starts to live its own life, dictating the rules to its creator. The power of continuity is this: to assert themselves, the very existence, as a prerequisite because the game can be played.
And nothing is so damn seriously as a game.
